Add notes on composites
This commit is contained in:
		@@ -515,3 +515,119 @@ This is value is known as the fracture toughness, $K_c$.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
At low thicknesses fracture toughness depends on thickness but as thickness increases, $K_c$
 | 
			
		||||
decreases to the constant value, the plane strain fracture toughness, $K_{1c}$.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
# Composites
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Composites are made of two or more materials, which when combined together, at up to a milimetre
 | 
			
		||||
scale, have superior properties to their parent materials.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Composites tend to be 2-phase: a dispersed phase in a matrix.
 | 
			
		||||
The disepersed phase tends to be fibres (large aspect ratio) or particles (low aspect ratio) which
 | 
			
		||||
are embedded in a matrix, which are often resins.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Composite properites are affected by the dispersed phase geometry:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
- Shape
 | 
			
		||||
- Size
 | 
			
		||||
- Distribution
 | 
			
		||||
- Relative orientation (for fibres)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Rule of Mixtures
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
$E_c$ lies between the arithmetic mean (upper limit):
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
$$V_mE_m + E_pV_p$$
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
and the geometric mean (lower limit):
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
$$\frac{V_mE_mE_pV_p}{V_mE_m + E_pV_p}$$
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Where $E_c$, $E_m$, $E_p$ are the Young's moduluses of the composite, matrix, and particles,
 | 
			
		||||
respectively, and $V_m$ and $V_p$ are the volume of the matrix and particles, respectively.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Particle Reinforced Composites
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Applications of Composites
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<details>
 | 
			
		||||
<summary>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
#### Tungsten Carbide Cobalt for Cutting Tools
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
</summary>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The Tungest Carbide (WC) particle are a truly brittle ceramic.
 | 
			
		||||
They are very hard but the brittleness means they are easy to break.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The solution is to hold small WC particles in a ducitle metal matrix.
 | 
			
		||||
In this case it is Cobalt (Co).
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
This way, crack in one WC particle does not necessarily mean other particles are broken,
 | 
			
		||||
meaning the cutting tool overall still works.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Another advantage of this composite is that WC is not very thermally conductive and has a high
 | 
			
		||||
melting point, which allows it to work well the environment it's in.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
</details>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
<details>
 | 
			
		||||
<summary>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
#### Resin Bonded Alumina for Sanding Disks
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
</summary>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
This is another example of brittle but hard ceramics being put in a ductile matrix.
 | 
			
		||||
In this case it's a resin.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
It follows the same idea---separating the ceramics into small particles means the particles can
 | 
			
		||||
break and the product still works overall, as there are thousands of particles which are not broken.
 | 
			
		||||
</details>
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Fibre Reinforced Composites
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Specific Property
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Specific Property of a composite is a property divided by density of composite.
 | 
			
		||||
Here are some examples of specific properties:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
- Specific ultimate tensile stress $= \frac{\sigma_{UTS}}{\rho_c}$
 | 
			
		||||
- Specific Young's modulus/stiffness $= \frac{E_c}{\rho_c}$
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Influence of the Fibres
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Depends on:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
- Fibre type
 | 
			
		||||
- Fibre length and diameter
 | 
			
		||||
- Fibre orientation
 | 
			
		||||
- Strength of bond between fibre and matrix
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Stress Strain Graph of a Fibre Reinforced Composite
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||

 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Note that the composite fails at the same strain as the fibres but yields at the same strain as
 | 
			
		||||
the polymer matrix.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The elastic behaviour of the composite before yielding is dependent on the strength of the chemical
 | 
			
		||||
bonds between the surface of the fibre and matrix.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
### Mechanical Performance of a Fibre Reinforced Composite
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
- Stress/strain behaviour of fibre
 | 
			
		||||
- Stress/strain behaviour of matrix
 | 
			
		||||
- Fibre volume fraction
 | 
			
		||||
- Applied stress direction
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
  Longitudinal is along direction of fibres, transverse is 90\textdegree to direction.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
  Fibre composites tend to be much much weaker in transverse direction:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
  Composite    | Longitudinal UTS | Transverse UTS 
 | 
			
		||||
  ------------ | ---------------- | --------------
 | 
			
		||||
  GF/PET       | 700              | 20
 | 
			
		||||
  CF/Epoxy     | 1000             | 35
 | 
			
		||||
  Kevlar/Epoxy | 1200             | 20
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
  (All units in MPa)
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user