notes/uni/mmme/2xxx/2053_mechanics_of_solids/fatigue.md

7.6 KiB
Executable File

author date title tags uuid
Akbar Rahman \today MMME2053 // Fatigue
mmme2053
fatigue
materials
uni
engineering
23852418-9fbb-44b8-a697-3c8b566e5143

Stages of Fatigue

1: Crack Initiation

  • happens on a micro-structural level

  • causes the start fatigue cracks

  • persistent slip bands form at the surface

    • they are the result of dislocations moving along crystallographic planes
    • leads to slip band intrusions and extrusions on the surface
    • act as stress concentrations, leading to crack initiationA

  • crystallographic slip is controlled by shear stresses rather than normal stresses
  • therefore cracks tend to initially grow in a plane of maximum shear stress range
  • this leads to short cracks, usually on the order of a few grains

The loading in this figure is horizontal tension

2: Crack Propagation

  • the fatigue cracks tend to join together with more cycles
  • they grow along planes of maximum tensile stress

3: Final Fracture

  • occurs when crack reaches critical length

  • results in either

    • ductile tearing (plastic collapse)
    • cleavage (brittle fracture)

Total Life Approach (Estimating Lifetime of a Part)

  • based on lab tests

    • carried out under controlled loading conditions
    • either stress or strain controlled loading conditions
    • performed on idealised specimens
    • specimens usually have finely polished defects (minimises surface roughness effects, affecting stage 1 crack initiation)
  • tests give number of loading cycles to the initiation of a measurable crack as a function of applied stress or strain parameters

  • measurability is dictated by the accuracy of the crack detection method used

  • this is typically between 0.75 mm to 1.00 mm

  • the challenge of fatigue design is to then relate the tests to actual component lives under real loading conditions

  • traditionally, most fatigue testing was based stress controlled conditions with mean stress, S_m = 0, which is known as a fully reversed load

  • the data was presented in the form of S-N curves (either semi-log or log-log plots) of alternating stress, S_a, against cycles to failure, N (failure defined as fracture)

  • figure \ref{fig:typical-s-n} contains schematic representations of two typical S-N curves
  • part (a) shows a continuously sloping curve
  • part (b) shows a discontinuity ("knee") in the curve---this is only found in a few materials (notably low strength steels) between 10^6 and 10^7 cycles under non-corrosive conditions

\label{fig:typical-s-n}

  • the curves are normally drawn through the median life value

  • therefore represent 50 percent expected failure

  • fatigue strength, S_e, is a hypothetical value of stress range at failure for exactly N cycles as obtained from an S-N curve

  • fatigue limit (or endurance limit) is the limiting value of the median fatigue strength as $N$ becomes very large (>10^8)

Effect of Mean Stress

  • mean stress has a significant effect on fatigue behaviour in cyclically loaded components
  • in figure \ref{fig:effect-of-mean-stress} you can see tensile mean stresses reduce fatigue life
  • compressive stresses increase fatigue life

\label{fig:effect-of-mean-stress}

  • effect of mean stress commonly represented as a plot of S_a against S_m for a given fatigue life
  • attempts have been made to generalise the relationship, as shown in figure \ref{fig:s_a-s_m}

\label{fig:s_a-s_m}

  • modified Goodman line assumes linear relationship, where gradient and intercept are defined by fatigue life, S_e, and material UTS, S_u, respectively

  • Gerber parabola employs same intercepts but relationship is a parabola

  • Soderberg line assumes linear relationship but the x intercept (mean axis end point) is taken as yield stress, S_y

  • these curves can be extended into the compressive mean stress region to give increasing allowable alternating stress with increasing compressive mean stress

  • this is normally taken to be horizontal for design purposes and conservatism

Effect of Stress Concentrations

  • fatigue failure is most commonly associated with notch-type features

  • stress concentrations associated with notch-type features typically leads to local plastic strain and eventually fatigue cracking

  • the estimation of stress concentration factors (SCFs) are typically expressed in terms of an elastic SCF, K_t:

    K_t = \frac{\sigma^{\text{el}}_{\text{max}}}{\sigma_{\text{nom}}}
  • the fatigue strength of a notched component can be predicted with the fatigue notch factor, K_f, which is defined as the ratio of the fatigue strengths:

    K_f= \frac{S_a^{\text{smooth}}}{S_a^{\text{notch}}}

    i thought S_a is alternating stress and S_e is fatigue strength but the uni slides (slide 18) say otherwise 😭 TODO: find out what it's meant to be for sure

    • however K_f is found to vary with both alternating stress level and mean stress level and thus number of cycles
  • figure \ref{fig:effect-of-notch} shows the effect of a notch, with K_t = 3.4, on the fatigue behaviour of wrought aluminium alloy

\label{fig:effect-of-notch}

S-N Design Procedure for Fatigue

  • constant life diagrams plotted as S_a against S_m (also known as Goodman diagrams) (figure \ref{fig:goodman-diagram}) can be used in design to give safe estimates of fatigue life and loads

\ref{fig:goodman-diagram}

  • the fatigue strength for zero mean stress is is reduced by the fatigue notch factor, K_f

  • K_t is used if K_f is not known

  • for static loading of a ductile component with a stress concentration, failure still occurs when mean stress, S_m, is equal to UTS

  • failure at intermediate values of mean stress is assumed to be given by the dotted line

  • in order to avoid yield of whole cross-section of component, maximum nominal stress must be less than the yield stress, S_y:

    S_m + S_a < S_y

Safety Factor, F

  • determined from the position of the point relative to the safe/fail boundary:

    \frac1F = \frac{S_aK_f}{S_e} + \frac{S_m}{S_u}

    Derivation

    F = \frac{OB}{OA}

    from similar triangles we get

    \frac{S_a}{\frac{S_u}{F} - S_m} = \frac{S_e}{K_fS_u}

Failure Examples

Bicycle Crank Arm

D.H.-106 Comet Failure

  • 1st production jet liner (debut in 1952)
  • several crashed in 1954 led to an inquiry
  • water tank testing and examination of a recovered fuselage showed that failure originated at a square corner window
  • future designs used oval windows

Glossary (of Symbols)

  • notch stress concentration factor, K_f
  • stress concentration factor, K_t
  • alternating stress, S_a
  • fatigue strength, S_e --- hypothetical value of stress range at failure for exactly N cycles
  • mean stress, S_m
  • ultimate tensile stress, S_u
  • yield strength, S_y