7.6 KiB
Executable File
author | date | title | tags | uuid | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akbar Rahman | \today | MMME2053 // Fatigue |
|
23852418-9fbb-44b8-a697-3c8b566e5143 |
Stages of Fatigue
1: Crack Initiation
-
happens on a micro-structural level
-
causes the start fatigue cracks
-
persistent slip bands form at the surface
- they are the result of dislocations moving along crystallographic planes
- leads to slip band intrusions and extrusions on the surface
- act as stress concentrations, leading to crack initiationA
- crystallographic slip is controlled by shear stresses rather than normal stresses
- therefore cracks tend to initially grow in a plane of maximum shear stress range
- this leads to short cracks, usually on the order of a few grains
2: Crack Propagation
- the fatigue cracks tend to join together with more cycles
- they grow along planes of maximum tensile stress
3: Final Fracture
-
occurs when crack reaches critical length
-
results in either
- ductile tearing (plastic collapse)
- cleavage (brittle fracture)
Total Life Approach (Estimating Lifetime of a Part)
-
based on lab tests
- carried out under controlled loading conditions
- either stress or strain controlled loading conditions
- performed on idealised specimens
- specimens usually have finely polished defects (minimises surface roughness effects, affecting stage 1 crack initiation)
-
tests give number of loading cycles to the initiation of a measurable crack as a function of applied stress or strain parameters
-
measurability is dictated by the accuracy of the crack detection method used
-
this is typically between 0.75 mm to 1.00 mm
-
the challenge of fatigue design is to then relate the tests to actual component lives under real loading conditions
-
traditionally, most fatigue testing was based stress controlled conditions with mean stress,
S_m = 0
, which is known as a fully reversed load -
the data was presented in the form of S-N curves (either semi-log or log-log plots) of alternating stress,
S_a
, against cycles to failure,N
(failure defined as fracture)
- figure \ref{fig:typical-s-n} contains schematic representations of two typical S-N curves
- part (a) shows a continuously sloping curve
- part (b) shows a discontinuity ("knee") in the curve---this is only found in a few materials
(notably low strength steels) between
10^6
and10^7
cycles under non-corrosive conditions
-
the curves are normally drawn through the median life value
-
therefore represent 50 percent expected failure
-
fatigue strength,
S_e
, is a hypothetical value of stress range at failure for exactlyN
cycles as obtained from an S-N curve -
fatigue limit (or endurance limit) is the limiting value of the median fatigue strength as $N$ becomes very large (
>10^8
)
Effect of Mean Stress
- mean stress has a significant effect on fatigue behaviour in cyclically loaded components
- in figure \ref{fig:effect-of-mean-stress} you can see tensile mean stresses reduce fatigue life
- compressive stresses increase fatigue life
- effect of mean stress commonly represented as a plot of
S_a
againstS_m
for a given fatigue life - attempts have been made to generalise the relationship, as shown in figure \ref{fig:s_a-s_m}
-
modified Goodman line assumes linear relationship, where gradient and intercept are defined by fatigue life,
S_e
, and material UTS,S_u
, respectively -
Gerber parabola employs same intercepts but relationship is a parabola
-
Soderberg line assumes linear relationship but the x intercept (mean axis end point) is taken as yield stress,
S_y
-
these curves can be extended into the compressive mean stress region to give increasing allowable alternating stress with increasing compressive mean stress
-
this is normally taken to be horizontal for design purposes and conservatism
Effect of Stress Concentrations
-
fatigue failure is most commonly associated with notch-type features
-
stress concentrations associated with notch-type features typically leads to local plastic strain and eventually fatigue cracking
-
the estimation of stress concentration factors (SCFs) are typically expressed in terms of an elastic SCF,
K_t
:K_t = \frac{\sigma^{\text{el}}_{\text{max}}}{\sigma_{\text{nom}}}
-
the fatigue strength of a notched component can be predicted with the fatigue notch factor,
K_f
, which is defined as the ratio of the fatigue strengths:K_f= \frac{S_a^{\text{smooth}}}{S_a^{\text{notch}}}
i thought
S_a
is alternating stress andS_e
is fatigue strength but the uni slides (slide 18) say otherwise 😭 TODO: find out what it's meant to be for sure- however
K_f
is found to vary with both alternating stress level and mean stress level and thus number of cycles
- however
-
figure \ref{fig:effect-of-notch} shows the effect of a notch, with
K_t = 3.4
, on the fatigue behaviour of wrought aluminium alloy
S-N Design Procedure for Fatigue
- constant life diagrams plotted as
S_a
againstS_m
(also known as Goodman diagrams) (figure \ref{fig:goodman-diagram}) can be used in design to give safe estimates of fatigue life and loads
-
the fatigue strength for zero mean stress is is reduced by the fatigue notch factor,
K_f
-
K_t
is used ifK_f
is not known -
for static loading of a ductile component with a stress concentration, failure still occurs when mean stress,
S_m
, is equal to UTS -
failure at intermediate values of mean stress is assumed to be given by the dotted line
-
in order to avoid yield of whole cross-section of component, maximum nominal stress must be less than the yield stress,
S_y
:S_m + S_a < S_y
Safety Factor, F
-
determined from the position of the point relative to the safe/fail boundary:
\frac1F = \frac{S_aK_f}{S_e} + \frac{S_m}{S_u}
Derivation
F = \frac{OB}{OA}
from similar triangles we get
\frac{S_a}{\frac{S_u}{F} - S_m} = \frac{S_e}{K_fS_u}
Failure Examples
Bicycle Crank Arm
D.H.-106 Comet Failure
- 1st production jet liner (debut in 1952)
- several crashed in 1954 led to an inquiry
- water tank testing and examination of a recovered fuselage showed that failure originated at a square corner window
- future designs used oval windows
Glossary (of Symbols)
- notch stress concentration factor,
K_f
- stress concentration factor,
K_t
- alternating stress,
S_a
- fatigue strength,
S_e
--- hypothetical value of stress range at failure for exactlyN
cycles - mean stress,
S_m
- ultimate tensile stress,
S_u
- yield strength,
S_y